Articles

Concussion: Back to Basics Posted about 7 years ago

Photo: The Telegraph

Concussion: Back to Basics

It’s the start of the new school year and the beginning of a new season of winter sports and that’s meant that I’ve been busy delivering education sessions on how to best manage injuries and specifically, how to deal with concussions.

Understandably, concussion raises a number of concerns for those providing sport, particularly those who are working with children, and it’s always interesting hearing from coaches what they are most worried about. It has been clear to me that over the last couple of years awareness of the injury has rocketed (significant thanks have to go to the RFU and their Headcase campaign for that) but this year there has been one consistent theme that has been raised – the nervousness of coaching staff to make a “diagnosis”.

“I’m not a doctor, how can I possibly decide if a player has had a concussion?”

The answer is simple – no one is asking you to. But what you do need to do is have a suspicion. In education sessions, I tell coaches to ask themselves two questions:

1. Have you seen an event that could have caused a concussion? (or has someone told you about an incident of concern – you can’t see everything)
A direct blow to the head or a hard hit causing a whiplash of the head.

2. Is the player showing any signs or symptoms that are not normal for them?
Talk to them. How do they feel? Any headache? Saw stars after the hit? Feel a bit dizzy? Maybe they stumbled as they got up.

If you answer “yes” to both of those questions then your suspicions should have been raised and we follow the mantra “If in doubt, sit them out”. We remove them from the pitch. Job done. The benefits of letting a player carry on never outweigh the risks. They follow the return to play pathway.

Empowerment to make the right call.

This raises a serious point for the senior staff within schools and committees at clubs. You will have parents complain. “Little Johnny is absolutely fine. I’m his parent, I want him to be allowed to play”. Don’t back down, support your coaches’ decisions, empower them to continue making those calls and protect the welfare of their players.

“the doctor said it was just a mild concussion and I only need a few days off sport”

I hear this sort of thing a lot. A coach has removed a player with a suspected concussion, but then a doctor gives advice that isn’t consistent with guidelines. What to do?

We’re at a fascinating point where the educated general public – the coaches, teachers, sports providers who have undergone training – have more knowledge than a lot of doctors on the issue. Concussion isn’t a vast topic covered at medical school, it doesn’t really fit into any medical speciality training (apart from perhaps sports medicine) and our knowledge about the injury has changed rapidly in the last few years. That means the advice given by doctors is often poor and out-of-date. It is good practise to seek medical attention after a concussion, mainly to make sure there is nothing else worrying going on, but accept that the wrong advice may be given which may put you in a difficult situation.

So, how should we deal with this situation? Unfortunately, there is the possibility of upset but you have to stay strong. The guidelines are extremely clear – there are no “grades” of concussion, all concussions are treated exactly the same, the player needs to follow the pathway. If the child is playing sport while under your care it is your responsibility to be satisfied they have followed the correct recovery guidelines.

Keeping it simple.

The benefits of allowing someone to play on who may have sustained a concussion will never outweigh the risks. Once we have accepted this, it really is as simple as “if in doubt, sit them out”.

The Rugby site is the only online coaching resource to offer a truly global perspective, subscribe for 12 months – now at a lower price point.

Enter your email address to continue reading

We frequently post interesting articles and comment from our world class content providers so please provide us with your email address and we will notify you when new articles are available.

We'll also get in touch with various news and updates that we think will interest you. We promise to not spam, sell, or otherwise abuse your address (you can unsubscribe at any time).

See all News & Opinions videos

Comments

comments powered by Disqus

Sam Medical Director of Return2Play, (www.return2play.org.uk), trained at Guy’s, King’s & St Thomas’s Hospitals Medical School, London. Following junior doctor posts in the West Midlands he undertook his basic surgical training in London before focusing on Trauma & Orthopaedics. Sam has qualifications in pre-hospital care and sports medicine and has extensive experience in planning and delivering medical care for sporting events. In recent years Sam has developed a keen interest in the diagnosis and management of concussion and has presented both nationally and internationally on the topic. Outside of concussion, he has an interest in young adult hip problems and sports injuries and is published on the subjects both in medical journals and text-books. Having played rugby from a young age Sam is now Chairman of a large community rugby club which provides rugby for both adults and children. He is passionate about enabling amateur players to access the same level of medical care that professionals are afforded.

Comments
Topic News & Opinions
Applicable to Coaches   Players   Others   Supporters and fans  

Related articles

Why more access to the high ball makes for a better game of rugby

Removing the ‘glove defence’ results in a much cleaner and quicker development of the play, as evidenced by Nick Bishop in this week’s analysis.

Why the ‘Dupont’s Law’ change really makes a difference

The ‘Dupont’ law tweaks have already had a concrete impact on the value of the kick return, one which totally belies the relatively small scope of the word ‘tweak’ as Nick Bishop illustrates.

How to use the use ‘the nail’ to generate LQB

With LQB at such a premium, Nick Bishop examines whether ball-placement after the tackle is a more reliable method of creating it than gain-line dominance.

Why the ‘caterpillar countdown’ can change the face of rugby

Nick Bishop provides some insights on the effect the new ‘5 second use it at the ruck’ rule will have on the game.

How to work the latest gadget play in short-range attack

One of the latest trial laws insists that it will no longer be possible to choose a scrum from a free-kick. Nick Bishop looks at what innovations may result especially close to opposition’s goal line.