Articles

Fine margins at No.7 – the two halves of Sam Cane in the 3rd Test Posted over 8 years ago

Photo: All Blacks Open Forum

Fine margins at No.7 – the two halves of Sam Cane in the 3rd Test

The margins between winning and losing Test matches are very fine, and nowhere is this axiom truer than in the actions and decision-making of the open-side flanker.

Richie McCaw was the best in the world over a long period of time at ‘treading the high wire’ of refereeing and decision-making in this area, while his replacement in the New Zealand side, the Chiefs’ Sam Cane, is still learning the ropes.

In the 3rd Test against Wales, Cane experienced both the best and the worst of all possible scenarios. Over the first 46 minutes of the match he was penalized four times and finally yellow-carded by referee Jerome Garces for repeated infringement. The final 24 minutes witnessed a remarkable transformation, with Cane winning three turnovers in contact, one of which was returned for a try, and providing the ‘quick hands’ link for Dane Coles score in the 62nd minute.

Let’s take a look at some of those fine margins in the light of Richie McCaw’s coaching module on the breakdown.

The penalty which finally broke Garces’ patience and led to the issue of the yellow card occurred just after half-time:

View it here

In the segment of Richie McCaw’s module dealing with the defensive breakdown (parts 7-9), the ex-All Black captain indicates that there are three possible decisions for the open-side flanker at every tackle situation:

1. Become the tackle assist
2. Attack the ball on the ground
3. Pull out into the defensive line

The accuracy of his decision-making between these three options is the prime measure of a no.7’s successful (defensive) performance.

In the example above, there is a clear window of opportunity for Sam Cane to make an impact from the ‘tackle assist’ position. After the Wales #15 Rhys Patchell receives the high ball, he is turned by the first chaser Julian Savea on to the All Blacks’ side (see Wayne Smith’s module on “Contesting the high ball”), and at 35:33 there is a temporary disconnect between Patchell and his support (2 Ken Owens and 23 Scott Williams).

So far, so good. However, Cane has not quite squared up his body ‘North-South before he is punched out of the tackle area by a very good cleanout from Ken Owens. It is at this juncture in the sequence that Cane makes the wrong decision. He goes in for a second bite at the ball instead of accepting that the window of opportunity has closed, and pulling out into the defensive line.

With Cane rolling on to the Wales side of the breakdown, the Welsh half-back Rhys Webb is able to milk the penalty & yellow card out of Garces by throwing the ball directly into Cane’s body.

Now compare Cane’s actions and decision-making from his ‘golden’ period in the last quarter of the match:

Watch it here

In this example, 22 Lima Sopoaga make a positive tackle on Scott Williams, stopping the Welsh centre in his tracks. At 66:06 Sam Cane shifts through his option menu and makes his decision in an instant, and it is the right one. Despite the platform created by Sopoaga’s tackle, Wales #13 Jonathan Davies is still closest to the ball-carrier and therefore there is no isolation.

Cane momentarily dips in as if to attack the ball before pulling out into the defensive line, and his action creates a huge imbalance on the next phase at 66:08 in the All Blacks’ favour. With six Welsh players absorbed by the first ruck, three Wales attackers at 1st receiver are confronted by no less than five All Black defenders in the same area. New Zealand are able to develop excellent line-speed off their numbers advantage, with Cane dislodging the ball in a strong tackle on Taulupe Faletau.

A second example from the final sequence of play from the match, shows Cane making another correct decision, on this occasion attacking the ball on the ground.

Richie McCaw observes in his module that a successful tackle bust can have the effect of isolating the attacker from his support, and that is what happens here. Faletau makes five metres on a pick & go but loses contact with his first support player.

At 82:32 it becomes a contest between Cane and the Welsh replacement half-back Gareth Davies, and Cane holds all the trump cards. Cane already meets Richie McCaw’s requirements for a successful jackal:

• a wide leg base to give stability
• a lower body position than Davies – he wins the ‘battle of the shoulders’
• 100% commitment to the play

Cane wrestles the ball away as he’s blown out by the next wave of Welsh cleaners and suddenly it’s 14-point turnaround score 80 metres downfield for Israel Dagg!

A third involvement by Sam Cane at an attacking breakdown had a subtle but decisive impact in the build-up to Beauden Barrett’s try in the 57th minute:

View here

At 56:34 the New Zealand wing Julian Savea gets some forward movement through the tackle of 23 Scott Williams, and Cane slots into the perfect niche Richie McCaw recommends for the open-side flanker in inside support (parts 3 & 5) – at a 45° angle, one to two metres off the ball-carrier.

At 56:36 he identifies the primary threat – his opposite number Sam Warburton – and gets a good knee-bend which enables him to explode like a coiled spring into Warburton’s rib-cage. The North-South angle, the knee-bend and the low body height all follow Dr. McCaw’s prescription as Warburton is driven fully five metres backwards through the Welsh defensive line.

Cane’s dominance at cleanout has a critical spin-off. The key defender in the following passing movement is Wales #10 Dan Biggar, and Cane’s cleanout forces Biggar to take the long way around in order to get to the far side of the field:

Biggar is half a step late in cover defence when Beauden Barrett receives the ball and skirts past Liam Williams, and that half-step was the result of Cane’s dominant cleanout creating interference in the Welsh defensive pattern.

It is indeed a game of fine margins.

The Rugby site is the only online coaching resource to offer a truly global perspective, subscribe for 12 months – now at a lower price point.

Enter your email address to continue reading

We frequently post interesting articles and comment from our world class content providers so please provide us with your email address and we will notify you when new articles are available.

We'll also get in touch with various news and updates that we think will interest you. We promise to not spam, sell, or otherwise abuse your address (you can unsubscribe at any time).

See all News & Opinions videos

Comments

comments powered by Disqus

Nick has worked as a rugby analyst and advisor to Graham Henry (1999-2002), Mike Ruddock (2004-2006) and latterly Stuart Lancaster (2011-2015). He also worked on the 2001 British & Irish Lions tour to Australia and produced his first rugby book with Graham Henry at the end of the tour. Since then, three more rugby books have followed, all of which of have either been nominated for, or won national sports book awards. The latest is a biography of Phil Larder, the first top Rugby League coach to successfully transfer over to Union. It is entitled “The Iron Curtain”. Nick has also written or contributed to four other books on literature and psychology. "He is currently writing articles for The Roar and The Rugby Site, and working as a strategy consultant to Stuart Lancaster and the Leinster coaching staff for their European matches."

Comments
Topic News & Opinions
Applicable to Coaches   Players   Others   Supporters and fans  

Related articles

Why the new ‘escort’ rules will revive contestable kick-offs

Nick Bishop examines how the ‘no glove’ kicking defence has revived the interest in contestable kick-offs again.

Why more access to the high ball makes for a better game of rugby

Removing the ‘glove defence’ results in a much cleaner and quicker development of the play, as evidenced by Nick Bishop in this week’s analysis.

How to shuffle the deck close to the goal-line

Analyst Nick Bishop illustrates how the ‘use it or lose it’ mindset now applied (under the new law), to “The ball is played or taken into in-goal by an attacking player and is then held up”, is promoting more attacking innovation.

How to exploit the ELV on defensive scrum-halves [from scrum] – part 2

Nick follows on from his earlier article on how the scrum has now became a favourite weapon of attack and the short-side was the red-hot area target zone.

Why the ‘Dupont’s Law’ change really makes a difference

The ‘Dupont’ law tweaks have already had a concrete impact on the value of the kick return, one which totally belies the relatively small scope of the word ‘tweak’ as Nick Bishop illustrates.