Articles

How to attack ‘heads-up’ from scrum Posted almost 8 years ago

Photo: Daily Mail

How to attack ‘heads-up’ from scrum

In his coaching module on the construction of back moves, Wayne Smith searches for the meaning of the popular phrase “heads up football”. That phrase is often-used in the commentary on games but it is rarely broken down into specifics.

“A lot of coaches talk about ‘heads-up rugby’ in attack,” he says.

“But what does that mean?… If you don’t know what you’re looking for, and what sort of feedback to give, you are not going to be successful”.

Wayne Smith goes on to define ‘heads-up’ attack as the ability to read and react to what the defence is doing, and communicate your understanding to the back-line director.

In his coaching module on “Walk through on Attack”, ex-All Black centre Conrad Smith develops this thread further, pointing up the specific attacking possibilities that can occur from left-side scrums in that prime attacking zone inside the opposition 40m line.

In this scenario the opposition half-back can often be caught on the ‘wrong side’ of the play near the touch-line, which presents some inviting opportunities for the attacking side when they stack all their backs to the open side of the field.

The message from these two great All Black minds is that ‘heads-up’ means an awareness of field position, of opposition tendencies and how to exploit them, plus the ability to communicate the right solutions effectively to your team-mates.

A lucid recent example of these processes working together to produce a score occurred in the Wales v England Six Nations match last Saturday afternoon.

View it now

Just before the scrum was set, the Welsh half-back Rhys Webb and the key attacker on the play – blindside wing, #11 Liam Williams – are snapshotted on camera together, with Webb talking quietly to Williams behind the back of his hand. That is probably where the plot was first hatched.

Scrums on the (attacking) left side of the field are notoriously difficult to defend. Usually the defending right wing stays put on the short-side wherever his opposite number lines up – as Conrad Smith says, there is always a chance of the scrum being promoted on the attacking loose-head side and an 8-9 move down that narrow corridor. Meanwhile the scrum-half has a difficult decision to make: does he chase around to the base to disrupt, or pull out and circle around to link up with the open-side defence?

At 37:30 we can see that England have collectively failed to answer these questions with any accuracy. Number 14 Jack Nowell is still out of shot on the blind-side and number 9 Ben Youngs has taken the risk of chasing around on to the Wales eighth man Ross Moriarty. As soon as Moriarty successfully gets the ball away to his scrum-half, England are in serious trouble.

In the freeze-frame Wales have a clear five on three in the middle of the field:

Webb is looking to engage the England number 10 George Ford and Liam Williams is ‘hiding’ just behind him, with Youngs having been ‘used up’ by the chase around the back of the scrum and Nowell still out of frame beyond the England 15 metre line. Meanwhile the two England centres Owen Farrell and Jonathan Joseph are also looking at an overload with three Welsh attackers (10 Dan Biggar, 12 Scott Williams and 13 Jon Davies) opposite them.

Wales would also have understood from their preparation prior to the game that England always stick close to Ford in the 10 channel in these scenarios. As Webb brings the ball to the gain-line, Ford has a pair of ‘minders’ both inside (number 7 Jack Clifford) and outside him, with Farrell engaged by the angled ‘holding’ run of Scott Williams.

All of this leaves poor Jonathan Joseph defending on what appears to be an island, and surrounded by a sea of red at 37:31.

If he moves in towards Williams, that leaves Davies and Biggar free outside him. In the event he stays out on the Wales 10 and 12 and Williams has a clear run through to the goal-line to score untouched.

All the way through from the initial conversation between the two key attackers Webb and Williams, the accurate prediction of the way the England defence would react and the identification of where the space would be, the scenario fulfils Wayne Smith’s definition of ‘heads-up’ attacking rugby exactly. It is planned but it is also executed according to the circumstances of the moment.

I firmly believe the planning stage occurred well before the game was played and had been ‘held in storage’, certainly for weeks and maybe for months. The scoring move is a carbon copy of a try the All Blacks scored against Argentina in the third round of the 2016 Rugby Championship:

Watch it now

A few years ago, the Pumas used to defend these situations by inserting their blind-side wing in the 10 channel to provide the extra open-side defender, with the scrum-half looking after the short-side on his own.

In this instance however, the wing is again defending empty space out of camera shot, while the scrum-half Martin Landajo is attempting to get a read off Julian Savea as to All Black intentions. He tries to mirror Savea as he jumps left at 10:19, then back to the right one second later.

Landajo follows the first move but is (fatally) a step slow on the second, and that is enough to allow the same narrative to develop as in the Wales-England game. The New Zealand 9 Aaron Smith engages Puma 10 Nicolas Sanchez while the Argentine 12 is successfully held by the angled run of Ryan Crotty. This levers open the space for Savea to run past the hapless #13 Matias Orlando stuck out on his island!

Summary

Playing ‘heads-up’ attacking rugby does not mean approaching a contest without any preparation and relying on instinct or hunches to guide you through all the labyrinths a game of rugby presents. Far from it.

It means being ready to improvise from the foundation of a real depth of preparation off the field. When something clicks mentally and you recognize the overlap in preparation and on-field circumstances, you act decisively.

It means being able to communicate your recognition clearly to those around you in order to realize the opportunity fully and cohesively. ‘Heads up’ is nothing else but the perfect marriage of preparation off the field and action on it – and for those heady thirty seconds before and during that attacking scrum against England, that is exactly what Wales achieved.

The Rugby site is the only online coaching resource to offer a truly global perspective, subscribe for 12 months – now at a lower price point.

Enter your email address to continue reading

We frequently post interesting articles and comment from our world class content providers so please provide us with your email address and we will notify you when new articles are available.

We'll also get in touch with various news and updates that we think will interest you. We promise to not spam, sell, or otherwise abuse your address (you can unsubscribe at any time).

See all News & Opinions videos

Comments

comments powered by Disqus

Nick has worked as a rugby analyst and advisor to Graham Henry (1999-2002), Mike Ruddock (2004-2006) and latterly Stuart Lancaster (2011-2015). He also worked on the 2001 British & Irish Lions tour to Australia and produced his first rugby book with Graham Henry at the end of the tour. Since then, three more rugby books have followed, all of which of have either been nominated for, or won national sports book awards. The latest is a biography of Phil Larder, the first top Rugby League coach to successfully transfer over to Union. It is entitled “The Iron Curtain”. Nick has also written or contributed to four other books on literature and psychology. "He is currently writing articles for The Roar and The Rugby Site, and working as a strategy consultant to Stuart Lancaster and the Leinster coaching staff for their European matches."

Comments
Topic News & Opinions
Applicable to Coaches   Players   Others   Supporters and fans  

Related articles

Why the new ‘escort’ rules will revive contestable kick-offs

Nick Bishop examines how the ‘no glove’ kicking defence has revived the interest in contestable kick-offs again.

Why more access to the high ball makes for a better game of rugby

Removing the ‘glove defence’ results in a much cleaner and quicker development of the play, as evidenced by Nick Bishop in this week’s analysis.

How to shuffle the deck close to the goal-line

Analyst Nick Bishop illustrates how the ‘use it or lose it’ mindset now applied (under the new law), to “The ball is played or taken into in-goal by an attacking player and is then held up”, is promoting more attacking innovation.

How to exploit the ELV on defensive scrum-halves [from scrum] – part 2

Nick follows on from his earlier article on how the scrum has now became a favourite weapon of attack and the short-side was the red-hot area target zone.

Why the ‘Dupont’s Law’ change really makes a difference

The ‘Dupont’ law tweaks have already had a concrete impact on the value of the kick return, one which totally belies the relatively small scope of the word ‘tweak’ as Nick Bishop illustrates.