Articles

Why one ‘knee equals two feet’ against the high tackle Posted over 1 year ago

One of the most popular commentators and ex-coaches in American Football was the great John Madden. He was a Superbowl winner as a coach with the Oakland Raiders in the 1970’s but he was arguably even more successful as a commentator and TV personality subsequently. His brand of jovial humour, his love of the unloved and bear-like 300 pounders on the offensive line, and his unapologetic passion for the game infected every viewer. You watched an NFL game as much to hear John Madden talk as you did to watch the players play.

One of Madden’s most famous pronouncements occurred in a game between the Cincinnati Bengals and the New York Jets in 1983. When a receiver is going out of bounds having made a catch, he is required to get both feet down on the ground for the receipt to be legitimate. On this occasion, the receiver got his knee down first and the catch was called good: ‘Well. I guess one knee equals two feet’ chuckled Madden on the telly. He wrote a best-selling book with the same title only three years later.

The phrase now makes perfect sense in the world of the high tackle in professional rugby. High tackles are very popular because they prevent offloads and under the current law, they can often lead to turnover scrums when the referee calls a maul.

There were at least three successful examples executed by the Blues in the recent Super Rugby Pacific quarter-final between the men from Auckland and the Waratahs. Her are two of them:

There are two moments of ‘clear and present danger’ amply underlined in the clips. As soon as a defender can hook his arms underneath the armpits of the ball-carrier, the attacker effectively loses control of the upper half of his body. When a second defender moves around the back to isolate him from his support, it is ‘curtains’ for the ball-carrier.

When he eventually gets to ground (Mark Nawaqanitawase in the first example) the defence is already primed for the counter-ruck; if he stays up (Michael Hooper in the second instance) it will inevitably draw a turnover scrum call from the ref.

The solution is to drop body-height quickly and dramatically, and get at least one knee to the ground immediately as soon as the ball-carrier feels the ‘hooks’ digging in. Even one knee on the deck is enough for the official to call for instant release in the tackle – so one knee down is as good as two feet off the ground:

Here Blues’ wing Mark Telea drops both knees as soon as he feels the high tackle technique beginning to threaten a turnover. The referee calls for release as the tackle is now complete. When the Waratahs try to prolong the contest and rob Telea of the ball, they are breaking the law and a penalty is rightly awarded.
Mark Telea is a rewarding object of study in this respect. He is so strong in tight contact situations that it is tempting for him to stay alive on the carry for as long as possible:

Telea sheds no less than four tackles on a short, winding run into midfield, but he judges the moment for a swift drop to the deck exactly right. He does not become infatuated with his own success on the run. It leaves New South Wales short of numbers on the following phase, and the Blues run away to score an unlikely long-range try from a position deep in their own end.

Summary

That is an inviting prospect when the attack can shift the ball away from established high tackles, which frequently consume as many as three or four defenders in order to be effective. If the ball-carrier can judge the moment to drop his body height right and get a knee to ground decisively, it can leave the D short for the following phase. One knee equals two feet, as John Madden used to say – but it can also mean a line-break, or even a try.

Enter your email address to continue reading

We frequently post interesting articles and comment from our world class content providers so please provide us with your email address and we will notify you when new articles are available.

We'll also get in touch with various news and updates that we think will interest you. We promise to not spam, sell, or otherwise abuse your address (you can unsubscribe at any time).

See all Tackling videos

Comments

comments powered by Disqus

Nick has worked as a rugby analyst and advisor to Graham Henry (1999-2002), Mike Ruddock (2004-2006) and latterly Stuart Lancaster (2011-2015). He also worked on the 2001 British & Irish Lions tour to Australia and produced his first rugby book with Graham Henry at the end of the tour. Since then, three more rugby books have followed, all of which of have either been nominated for, or won national sports book awards. The latest is a biography of Phil Larder, the first top Rugby League coach to successfully transfer over to Union. It is entitled “The Iron Curtain”. Nick has also written or contributed to four other books on literature and psychology. "He is currently writing articles for The Roar and The Rugby Site, and working as a strategy consultant to Stuart Lancaster and the Leinster coaching staff for their European matches."

Comments
Topic Tackling
Applicable to Coaches   Players   Others   Supporters and fans   Managers   Referees   Youths, ands, highs, and schools   Sevens  

Related articles

Why the new ‘escort’ rules will revive contestable kick-offs

Nick Bishop examines how the ‘no glove’ kicking defence has revived the interest in contestable kick-offs again.

Why more access to the high ball makes for a better game of rugby

Removing the ‘glove defence’ results in a much cleaner and quicker development of the play, as evidenced by Nick Bishop in this week’s analysis.

How to shuffle the deck close to the goal-line

Analyst Nick Bishop illustrates how the ‘use it or lose it’ mindset now applied (under the new law), to “The ball is played or taken into in-goal by an attacking player and is then held up”, is promoting more attacking innovation.

How to exploit the ELV on defensive scrum-halves [from scrum] – part 2

Nick follows on from his earlier article on how the scrum has now became a favourite weapon of attack and the short-side was the red-hot area target zone.

Why the ‘Dupont’s Law’ change really makes a difference

The ‘Dupont’ law tweaks have already had a concrete impact on the value of the kick return, one which totally belies the relatively small scope of the word ‘tweak’ as Nick Bishop illustrates.