Articles

How to exploit the ELV on defensive scrum-halves Posted 3 months ago

The start of the Rugby Championship 2024 was accompanied by a goodly raft of experimental changes designed to increase the speed of play and develop more positive content. One of the main stipulations, which is likely to gain traction world-wide in due course, is the shielding of the attacking scrum-half from interference at ruck and maul.

To help the scrum-half play the ball cleanly, a defender who was part of a ruck or maul would not be allowed to play an opponent who is within one metre of it and attempting to play the ball.

The defending scrum-half also received some important limitations to his movement around the base of the opposing set-piece:

“[He] must take up a position with both feet no further than the centre line of the tunnel; or permanently retire to a point on the offside line either at that team’s hindmost foot, or permanently retires at least five metres behind the hindmost foot.”

These two new law-trials have already had some concrete impacts in the first two rounds of play.

New Zealand scored a try down the short-side of a lineout drive where the law-trial preventing defensive interference on the #9 played a major role:

New Zealand scrum-half T.J. Perenara is casting a beady eye on the two Argentine defenders on the edges of the maul. He knows the open-side defender “1” cannot jump him as he takes hold of the pill, and he is waiting for the short-side guard “2” to commit so that he can exploit a two-on-one in that direction:

“The guy on the side of the maul can’t make a tackle on a number 9 unless he’s run a metre outside of the maul as well. He can’t be attached and impact the play straight away.”

The second game between Australia and South Africa offered an illustration of the impact of the defensive scrum-half having to retire behind the hindmost foot rather than chase around to the base:

The defending #9 is positioned directly behind the scrum and this opens up the possibility of the number 8 pick-up under no pressure, with a 8-9-11 move down the short-side a realistic scoring option.

Summary

Both the trial-laws are very sensible moves designed to clean up the grey area around offside at scrum, ruck and maul. At scrums we may see a revival of number 8 pick-ups, and more short-side options taken at ruck and maul with the boundary between ‘rucker’ and ‘defender’ more clearly defined.

Watch Sam Cordingly’s Attack off 9 video series on how to create a short side attack off 9.

Enter your email address to continue reading

We frequently post interesting articles and comment from our world class content providers so please provide us with your email address and we will notify you when new articles are available.

We'll also get in touch with various news and updates that we think will interest you. We promise to not spam, sell, or otherwise abuse your address (you can unsubscribe at any time).

See all Attack videos

Comments

comments powered by Disqus

Nick has worked as a rugby analyst and advisor to Graham Henry (1999-2002), Mike Ruddock (2004-2006) and latterly Stuart Lancaster (2011-2015). He also worked on the 2001 British & Irish Lions tour to Australia and produced his first rugby book with Graham Henry at the end of the tour. Since then, three more rugby books have followed, all of which of have either been nominated for, or won national sports book awards. The latest is a biography of Phil Larder, the first top Rugby League coach to successfully transfer over to Union. It is entitled “The Iron Curtain”. Nick has also written or contributed to four other books on literature and psychology. "He is currently writing articles for The Roar and The Rugby Site, and working as a strategy consultant to Stuart Lancaster and the Leinster coaching staff for their European matches."

Comments
Topic Attack
Applicable to Coaches   Players   Youths, ands, highs, and schools  

Related articles

Why the new ‘escort’ rules will revive contestable kick-offs

Nick Bishop examines how the ‘no glove’ kicking defence has revived the interest in contestable kick-offs again.

Why more access to the high ball makes for a better game of rugby

Removing the ‘glove defence’ results in a much cleaner and quicker development of the play, as evidenced by Nick Bishop in this week’s analysis.

How to shuffle the deck close to the goal-line

Analyst Nick Bishop illustrates how the ‘use it or lose it’ mindset now applied (under the new law), to “The ball is played or taken into in-goal by an attacking player and is then held up”, is promoting more attacking innovation.

How to exploit the ELV on defensive scrum-halves [from scrum] – part 2

Nick follows on from his earlier article on how the scrum has now became a favourite weapon of attack and the short-side was the red-hot area target zone.

Why the ‘Dupont’s Law’ change really makes a difference

The ‘Dupont’ law tweaks have already had a concrete impact on the value of the kick return, one which totally belies the relatively small scope of the word ‘tweak’ as Nick Bishop illustrates.