Articles

How to exploit the ELV on defensive scrum-halves [from scrum] – part 2 Posted 2 months ago

In this article how-to-exploit-the-elv-on-defensive-scrum-halves, I examined some of the possibilities of launching set moves with the defensive scrum-half now forced to retire behind the mid-line of the scrum. A quick reminder of the new trial law:

“[The #9] must take up a position with both feet no further than the centre line of the tunnel; or permanently retire to a point on the offside line either at that team’s hindmost foot, or permanently retire at least five metres behind the hindmost foot.”

Since then, in the latter half of the Rugby Championship coaching ideas of how best to exploit the new ELV took on a much more concrete form. The scrum became a favourite weapon of attack and the short-side was the red-hot area target zone.

First Argentina scored a try down the short-side of a scrum during their 67-27 rout of Australia in the fourth round:

This try is based on the same theory I observed in the previous article. At least four Argentine players [#’s 8, 9, 10 and 14] can move late to the short-side, while the Wallaby scrum-half is defending on the open-side and the wing is set deep in the backfield to cover a kick. With no pressure possible at the base of the set-piece, the Pumas can run the play unimpeded and exploit the overload in the right 15-5m zone.

The Wallabies clearly learned the lesson, and got some of their own back in the final round against New Zealand:

The aim is the same but the formula is slightly different. The formations on both sides of the ball are similar to the Argentine clip, but Australia uses its #9 and #10 to decoy the New Zealand back-row and scrum-half off to the open-side before switching #14 in the opposite direction. The kick-through ought to have resulted in a try for the Wallabies.

Summary

If the ELV on the positioning of scrum-halves at set-piece is passed into permanent law, it will once again open the scrum as an attacking weapon. Less interference at the base means more confidence for the attacking side to run its moves, and late movement will pay out its dividend.

Enter your email address to continue reading

We frequently post interesting articles and comment from our world class content providers so please provide us with your email address and we will notify you when new articles are available.

We'll also get in touch with various news and updates that we think will interest you. We promise to not spam, sell, or otherwise abuse your address (you can unsubscribe at any time).

See all Attack videos

Comments

comments powered by Disqus

Nick has worked as a rugby analyst and advisor to Graham Henry (1999-2002), Mike Ruddock (2004-2006) and latterly Stuart Lancaster (2011-2015). He also worked on the 2001 British & Irish Lions tour to Australia and produced his first rugby book with Graham Henry at the end of the tour. Since then, three more rugby books have followed, all of which of have either been nominated for, or won national sports book awards. The latest is a biography of Phil Larder, the first top Rugby League coach to successfully transfer over to Union. It is entitled “The Iron Curtain”. Nick has also written or contributed to four other books on literature and psychology. "He is currently writing articles for The Roar and The Rugby Site, and working as a strategy consultant to Stuart Lancaster and the Leinster coaching staff for their European matches."

Comments
Topic Attack
Applicable to Coaches  

Related articles

Why the new ‘escort’ rules will revive contestable kick-offs

Nick Bishop examines how the ‘no glove’ kicking defence has revived the interest in contestable kick-offs again.

Why more access to the high ball makes for a better game of rugby

Removing the ‘glove defence’ results in a much cleaner and quicker development of the play, as evidenced by Nick Bishop in this week’s analysis.

How to shuffle the deck close to the goal-line

Analyst Nick Bishop illustrates how the ‘use it or lose it’ mindset now applied (under the new law), to “The ball is played or taken into in-goal by an attacking player and is then held up”, is promoting more attacking innovation.

Why the ‘Dupont’s Law’ change really makes a difference

The ‘Dupont’ law tweaks have already had a concrete impact on the value of the kick return, one which totally belies the relatively small scope of the word ‘tweak’ as Nick Bishop illustrates.

How to build your lineout drive attack in the ‘red zone’

Get creative with your limitations, to turn them into a strength appears yo be Rassie Erasmus’ Springboks mantra as Nick Bishop illustrates.