Articles

How to manipulate the short-side from lineout Posted about 4 years ago

Photo: The Rugby Site

How to manipulate the short-side from lineout

The drive from lineout has become probably the most profitable means of attack from set-piece over the past few seasons. It has taken over from the scrum in that respect.

At the scrum, there is only one place to put the ball in and all of the forwards start in technically, their strongest positions. Offensive players may have to use their feet to direct the ball towards the base, which can cause instability. The number 8 must concentrate on controlling the ball with his feet, and cannot see the picture ahead of him like the ball-carrier in a maul. There are more things which can go wrong.

At the lineout, the attacking side can choose where they want to throw the ball, and they can look to deliver the ball into areas where their blocking wall will be stronger than the opposition defence. The ball in hand is easier to control than the ball at the feet, and players who start at the back of the drive can move past the ball to become blockers in front of it.

In short, the lineout drive is a better form of legalised obstruction than the scrum!

It can be a particularly effective ploy to preface an attack on the short side with a lineout drive, and this was a consistent theme in the recent Bledisloe Cup series between New Zealand and Australia.

The first example however, comes from England’s 2019 World Cup game against Argentina, at a lineout deep within the Pumas’ 22m zone:

View the clip

The initial receipt is made on the 15m line, then the drive rolls infield towards the Argentine posts. First one, then two England backs assist in the process of adding weight to the push over the right side of the maul. First #12 Owen Farrell, then #9 Ben Youngs initially bind on to the ball-carrier (#2 Jamie George), then move past him further up the maul to become blockers. This effect cannot be duplicated at a scrum.

The panoramic overhead shot from behind the posts reveals more about England’s real attacking intentions:

View the clip

As the drive develops towards the posts, no less than seven potential Argentine defenders feed themselves successively into the maul. Only two defenders are left to man the short-side: one is a hooker (#2 Julian Montoya), and the other is the #10 Benjamin Urdapilleta:

On the attacking side, the England number 10 George Ford shifts late across to the narrow side to join left wing Johnny May. When the ball is released, it is an unequal contest: England’s best ball-handler and their best finisher, set against an Argentine forward and their smallest back, in more than 20 metres of space:

View the clip

Examples from positions much further upfield were evident in the Bledisloe Cup series:

View the clip

Timings are an important factor compared to the scrum. Most scrums seldom last more than 7 seconds before the referee calls for the ball to be used, or some form of illegality is detected and he awards a penalty.

The lineout drive can be sustained for far longer than that, because the rules governing it a far more liberal:

16.15 – When a maul has stopped moving towards a goal line, it may restart moving towards a goal line providing it does so within five seconds. If it stops a second time but the ball is being moved and the referee can see it, the referee instructs the team to use the ball. The team in possession must then use the ball in a reasonable time.

The attacking side can temporarily stop, regroup and then begin again within five seconds. As long as they can achieve slight forward progress, they can keep probing for weaknesses in the defence.

In the above example, the original lineout receipt was made at 32:33 on the game clock:

The break down the side-line occurs 27 seconds later – and that would not be possible from a scrum!

The extra time afforded to the attack can be used to shift personnel around to its advantage. England moved their #10 to join their left wing in a mismatched short-side attack. The All Blacks have their dynamic number 8 Ardie Savea widen towards touch at 32:50, and he finds himself opposite the Wallaby half-back Nic White. It is numbers 9+8 versus numbers 2+9, and that is a situation the All Blacks can exploit.

The lineout drive is a more robust, manageable platform for set-piece attack than the scrum, especially if the short-side is the target area. The attacking side can keep the ball for longer, probe for weaknesses and create more potential mismatches on that narrow side of the field. The target area may be short, but attacking possibilities are long on potential!

The Rugby site is the only online coaching resource to offer a truly global perspective. Subscribe today and get inside the game.

Enter your email address to continue reading

We frequently post interesting articles and comment from our world class content providers so please provide us with your email address and we will notify you when new articles are available.

We'll also get in touch with various news and updates that we think will interest you. We promise to not spam, sell, or otherwise abuse your address (you can unsubscribe at any time).

See all Attack videos

Comments

comments powered by Disqus

Nick has worked as a rugby analyst and advisor to Graham Henry (1999-2002), Mike Ruddock (2004-2006) and latterly Stuart Lancaster (2011-2015). He also worked on the 2001 British & Irish Lions tour to Australia and produced his first rugby book with Graham Henry at the end of the tour. Since then, three more rugby books have followed, all of which of have either been nominated for, or won national sports book awards. The latest is a biography of Phil Larder, the first top Rugby League coach to successfully transfer over to Union. It is entitled “The Iron Curtain”. Nick has also written or contributed to four other books on literature and psychology. "He is currently writing articles for The Roar and The Rugby Site, and working as a strategy consultant to Stuart Lancaster and the Leinster coaching staff for their European matches."

Comments
Topic Attack
Applicable to Coaches   Players   Others   Supporters and fans   Managers   Referees   Youths, ands, highs, and schools  

Related articles

Why the new ‘escort’ rules will revive contestable kick-offs

Nick Bishop examines how the ‘no glove’ kicking defence has revived the interest in contestable kick-offs again.

Why more access to the high ball makes for a better game of rugby

Removing the ‘glove defence’ results in a much cleaner and quicker development of the play, as evidenced by Nick Bishop in this week’s analysis.

How to shuffle the deck close to the goal-line

Analyst Nick Bishop illustrates how the ‘use it or lose it’ mindset now applied (under the new law), to “The ball is played or taken into in-goal by an attacking player and is then held up”, is promoting more attacking innovation.

How to exploit the ELV on defensive scrum-halves [from scrum] – part 2

Nick follows on from his earlier article on how the scrum has now became a favourite weapon of attack and the short-side was the red-hot area target zone.

Why the ‘Dupont’s Law’ change really makes a difference

The ‘Dupont’ law tweaks have already had a concrete impact on the value of the kick return, one which totally belies the relatively small scope of the word ‘tweak’ as Nick Bishop illustrates.