Articles

How to work a modern pod system with LQB Posted 1 day ago

Modern pod systems have been transformed by the new breakdown guidelines, which quickened the tempo of attack considerably. But if the new emphasis on lightning-quick, 0-3 second ball from the ruck created myriad problems for the defence, it also generated a fair few for the attacking side as well.

‘The quickening’ allowed less time for the offence to regroup and drop into set pod formations like the 2-4-2 or the 1-3-3-1, and these are now rare birds at elite level. While one forward will likely continue to drop to either edge in multi-phase play, the roles of the other six forwards in between them are far more fluid than they used to be.

The recent November tour match between Ireland and Australia illustrated the main priorities in the modern game: quick and flexible regroupings with the old pod systems broken up into smaller units. Both teams struggled to defend the same base formation in Dublin, with one three-man forward pod off #9 and another two forwards operating ahead of the #10 outside them.

The first example occurred with the Wallabies in possession in the 9th minute:

The first pod of three forwards stands short to #9, with #10 standing shallow [no more than one metre] behind them. The second pod of two forwards are also short, so that play has still not crossed to far side of the field after the second pass is delivered. Typically, the spacings in the old 1-3-3-1 shape would be far wider, and the passes longer. The first pass out of pod is made directly behind the passer, the second is as flat as it can be, and it catches the Ireland #12 [Bundee Aki] still ‘in transit’ – looking to regroup to the far left edge of the field.

Ireland’s turn came in the 28th minute:

Again, one pass directly pulled behind out of pod, the second as flat as possible, with both pods compressed to one side of the pitch. The wider shot shows the distribution of forwards: two have cleared out the previous ruck on the right, one is standing on the left edge, with the “3” and the “2” occupying the middle between the two 15’s.

Summary

The arrival and expectation of LQB has changed life for attackers and defenders alike. Set pod formations like the 1-3-3-1 are a thing of the past, and it is all about quick regroupings and even quicker ‘chain’ passing.

Enter your email address to continue reading

We frequently post interesting articles and comment from our world class content providers so please provide us with your email address and we will notify you when new articles are available.

We'll also get in touch with various news and updates that we think will interest you. We promise to not spam, sell, or otherwise abuse your address (you can unsubscribe at any time).

See all Attack videos

Comments

comments powered by Disqus

Nick has worked as a rugby analyst and advisor to Graham Henry (1999-2002), Mike Ruddock (2004-2006) and latterly Stuart Lancaster (2011-2015). He also worked on the 2001 British & Irish Lions tour to Australia and produced his first rugby book with Graham Henry at the end of the tour. Since then, three more rugby books have followed, all of which of have either been nominated for, or won national sports book awards. The latest is a biography of Phil Larder, the first top Rugby League coach to successfully transfer over to Union. It is entitled “The Iron Curtain”. Nick has also written or contributed to four other books on literature and psychology. "He is currently writing articles for The Roar and The Rugby Site, and working as a strategy consultant to Stuart Lancaster and the Leinster coaching staff for their European matches."

Comments
Topic Attack
Applicable to Coaches   Players   Youths, ands, highs, and schools  

Related articles

Why the new ‘escort’ rules will revive contestable kick-offs

Nick Bishop examines how the ‘no glove’ kicking defence has revived the interest in contestable kick-offs again.

Why more access to the high ball makes for a better game of rugby

Removing the ‘glove defence’ results in a much cleaner and quicker development of the play, as evidenced by Nick Bishop in this week’s analysis.

How to shuffle the deck close to the goal-line

Analyst Nick Bishop illustrates how the ‘use it or lose it’ mindset now applied (under the new law), to “The ball is played or taken into in-goal by an attacking player and is then held up”, is promoting more attacking innovation.

How to exploit the ELV on defensive scrum-halves [from scrum] – part 2

Nick follows on from his earlier article on how the scrum has now became a favourite weapon of attack and the short-side was the red-hot area target zone.

Why the ‘Dupont’s Law’ change really makes a difference

The ‘Dupont’ law tweaks have already had a concrete impact on the value of the kick return, one which totally belies the relatively small scope of the word ‘tweak’ as Nick Bishop illustrates.