Articles

What does economy at the cleanout really look like? Posted almost 3 years ago

Photo: Sky Sport

The new breakdown guidelines first issued in June 2020, have produced a glut of lightning-quick (one to three second) ball in competitions all over the world. So much so, that the abbreviation “LQB” has already passed into mainstream usage in commentary on the game.

For the attack, those guidelines required ball-carriers to make no more than one movement on the ground after being tackled, and support players to remain on their feet and not ‘seal off’ by lying on top of the tackled player.

For the defence, tacklers have been required to remove themselves from the path of the cleanout post-haste, before any poach of the ball can be rewarded.

Contestants have been asked to support their own bodyweight, and attack the ball directly rather than the space behind the ball-carrier. They need to get a clearly-visible ‘lift’ on the pill.

By and large, it has made the resolution of the tackle contest far quicker than before, and that means less time for both sides to regroup before the ball is ready to be played.

That has also impacted the balance of the relationship between play-making and support at the ruck. Support at the ruck has become paramount, so play-makers have to be prepared to get stuck in and get their hands dirty more often, rather than reserving themselves for the next play automatically.

The Australian number 10 Quade Cooper always used to be known for his moments of play-making magic in his previous incarnation in Test rugby. During his renaissance at the age of 33 in the 2021 Rugby Championship, it was his willingness to multi-task which stood out.

With ruck ball being recycled so much more quickly, it frequently falls to the passer to re-ruck over the player to whom he has just delivered the ball. That is the new form of rugby economy at the cleanout:

View the clip

In this example from the first game between Australia and Argentina, Cooper passes from the base to number 14 Andrew Kellaway, then follows across field to become the first or second support player at the ruck, rather than running in behind to become the play-maker on next phase.

He has to be prepared for a major contest too. Quade is tracking across field on a collision course with Julian Montoya, the Pumas hooker who won the most turnovers on the ground in the whole of the tournament. This represents a significant break in the flow chart of activity for a first five-eighth, or outside half between phases: instead of Pass> Drop to play-maker, it is as likely to be: Pass> Re-ruck> Regenerate.

View the clip

View the clip

This is a longer sequence from the second half of the same game. Cooper ships the ball on to his captain Michael Hooper and sticks his head in as the first support player at the resultant ruck.

Play-making devolves to the number 9 Nic White on the next two phases, with first a run by number 6 Rob Leota and then a clean break by prop Taniela Tupou sustaining momentum for the attack.

Here is a more complex and varied example from the second Rugby Championship game between the Wallabies and the Springboks:

View the clip

Second five- eighth Samu Kerevi is used up on the first phase from an attacking scrum. Scrum-half Tate McDermott takes the ball up on the second play, with Quade Cooper plugging in as the second man in ruck support. That means all of the three main play-makers have been used up in contact in the first two phases, and play now has to be made by someone else on third phase:

View the clip

Kerevi has regenerated sufficiently to make the call for a short-side foray, but the essential passing work is done by number 7 Hooper from the base, replacement loose-head prop Angus Bell at first receiver and his brother in arms Taniela Tupou outside him. It is a terrific ‘no-look’ pass from the ‘Tongan Thor’ which sends left wing Marika Koroibete in for the try, with replacement hooker Fereti Kaitu’u providing ultimate width out on the left side-line.

Summary

The new ruck guidelines have accelerated the blurring of boundaries between ball-winners and ball-users, contact ‘grunts’ and mercurial play-makers. In the new breakdown economy, pass-and-move can now as easily be pass-and-ruck, and that may mean a number 10 having to learn to clean out a specialist poacher on the ground. Other players have to be ready to fill in the gaps on next phase, even with all of the primary attacking ‘creators’ absorbed in the contact zone.

Enter your email address to continue reading

We frequently post interesting articles and comment from our world class content providers so please provide us with your email address and we will notify you when new articles are available.

We'll also get in touch with various news and updates that we think will interest you. We promise to not spam, sell, or otherwise abuse your address (you can unsubscribe at any time).

See all Breakdown videos

Comments

comments powered by Disqus

Nick has worked as a rugby analyst and advisor to Graham Henry (1999-2002), Mike Ruddock (2004-2006) and latterly Stuart Lancaster (2011-2015). He also worked on the 2001 British & Irish Lions tour to Australia and produced his first rugby book with Graham Henry at the end of the tour. Since then, three more rugby books have followed, all of which of have either been nominated for, or won national sports book awards. The latest is a biography of Phil Larder, the first top Rugby League coach to successfully transfer over to Union. It is entitled “The Iron Curtain”. Nick has also written or contributed to four other books on literature and psychology. "He is currently writing articles for The Roar and The Rugby Site, and working as a strategy consultant to Stuart Lancaster and the Leinster coaching staff for their European matches."

Comments
Topic Breakdown
Applicable to Coaches   Players   Others   Supporters and fans   Managers   Referees   Youths, ands, highs, and schools   Sevens  

Related articles

Why the new ‘escort’ rules will revive contestable kick-offs

Nick Bishop examines how the ‘no glove’ kicking defence has revived the interest in contestable kick-offs again.

Why more access to the high ball makes for a better game of rugby

Removing the ‘glove defence’ results in a much cleaner and quicker development of the play, as evidenced by Nick Bishop in this week’s analysis.

How to shuffle the deck close to the goal-line

Analyst Nick Bishop illustrates how the ‘use it or lose it’ mindset now applied (under the new law), to “The ball is played or taken into in-goal by an attacking player and is then held up”, is promoting more attacking innovation.

How to exploit the ELV on defensive scrum-halves [from scrum] – part 2

Nick follows on from his earlier article on how the scrum has now became a favourite weapon of attack and the short-side was the red-hot area target zone.

Why the ‘Dupont’s Law’ change really makes a difference

The ‘Dupont’ law tweaks have already had a concrete impact on the value of the kick return, one which totally belies the relatively small scope of the word ‘tweak’ as Nick Bishop illustrates.