Articles

Winning the fight on the ground Posted almost 7 years ago

Photo: The Rugby Site

Winning the fight on the ground – 1st Test, New Zealand v. British & Irish Lions

Josh Syms’ excellent new series, focusing on techniques adopted by both sides at the breakdown, illustrates the amount of coaching time now devoted to body positions in contact.

It is also probably one of the technical areas in which the Lions were able to surprise the All Blacks with the quality of their play in the 2017 June series. The tendency of Lions’ ball-carriers to adjust their position on their ground, typically by performing a ‘power roll’ to take the ball away from a potential robber and give the support players extra time to arrive, was an important factor in their ability to keep ball and avoid turnovers.

During Joe Schmidt’s tenure as head coach, Ireland has probably led the way (at least in the Northern Hemisphere) in terms of advanced thinking about ball control. All aspects of breakdown play, including angle of cleanout entry to the tackle area, prioritizing one side of a ruck over another, the position of the ball-carrier on the deck and his preferred ball-placement in different attacking scenarios, have all been examined and dissected.

If you want to run a ball-control offence with long periods of possession, methods to win ‘the fight on the ground’ are crucial. For the ball-carrier, this means being pro-active.

As Josh Syms explains in the third part of his presentation, it is not enough to simply lay the ball back without thinking in the modern game, even at a full arm’s length. The timing of the placement and choice of options in presenting the ball are all key, as is the ability to withstand a challenge and offset the ‘jackal’ above you.

The first Test between the All Blacks and the Lions at Eden Park showcased a number of techniques described by Josh Syms, as they were interpreted by both sides.

Antony Watson and the proactive ‘long shoot’. One of the fundamentals is the willingness of the ball-carrier to make an extra effort from his ‘core’ (or solar plexus region) to move the top part of his torso towards his support and take it further away from the opponent. In the following example from the first half of the game at Eden Park, the ball is under no particular threat but Lions’ right wing Anthony Watson still makes a proactive effort to ‘shoot’ back towards his own goal-line on the ground, presenting the ball within two seconds for the second phase of the attack:

View it here

Watson is in the ideal ‘nail’ position (parallel to the side-line) as he places the ball:

Rieko Ioane and the ‘shoot’ under pressure. This example shows how the ‘shoot’ presentation can work under pressure from a defender. Here New Zealand wing Rieko Ioane has made the line-break, but the Lions’ number 8 Taulupe Faletau is above the ball as he goes to present it:

View it here

With the cleanout insufficient to take Faletau out of the play, Ioane does just enough to pin down his left shoulder to offset the jackal and allow a clean ball placement for the (positive) next phase:

Elliott Daly in ‘squeeze-ball’. With a potential threat present above the tackle ball in the form of Israel Dagg, Daly chooses to ‘squeeze’ the ball between his legs instead of trying to ‘shoot’ back towards his own goal-line:

View it here

As soon as Daly feels Dagg’s left arm working towards the ball, he pins his opposite (left) shoulder to the ground and brings his left leg across the ball to provide an additional barrier to any steal, and this is an especially valuable technique in heavy traffic, when ball security is the priority above quick delivery:

Peter O’Mahony and the ‘flat squeeze’. Here Lions captain Peter O’Mahony offers an illustration of the value of flattening the body to the ground in the squeeze-ball position:

View it here

As Josh Syms explains in his module, flattening the body out during the ‘squeeze-ball’ process – rather than for example performing it on your knees – decreases the safety risk for the ball-carrier while taking the ball further away from a potential contest by the opposition:

What happens when it all goes wrong! It doesn’t always work out as planned of course. The following example has the Lions’ number 7 Sean O’Brien trying to pin his opposite shoulder to the floor, only to have it levered back up by his All Black counterpart Sam Cane and forcing the turnover penalty:

View it here

These two screenshots show the two critical moments in close-up:

Sean O’Brien pulls his shoulder down as a preface to feeding back in the squeeze-ball position (as in the Daly example) but Cane is powerful enough to drag it back up and catch the process only halfway complete!

Summary

Technique on the ground at the post-tackle is becoming ever more detailed and focused from a coaching standpoint.

As Josh Syms’ series indicates, several different techniques are available to help the ball-carrier produce a quick delivery in contact and offset threats above the ball.

The ball-carrier can choose to ‘shoot’ back towards his support if he has the space and time, or ‘squeeze’ it back between his legs and flatten out if he’s in heavier traffic.

The most important factor of all is mind-set. Ball-carriers cannot approach contact thinking the ball can be placed back automatically. They have to be proactive and show a strong ‘core’ desire to move their body away from threats into the most suitable position for the attack to continue without losing momentum. They need to think and act ‘on their feet’ even when they are lying on the deck!

The Rugby site is the only online coaching resource to offer a truly global perspective, subscribe for 12 months – now at a lower price point.

Enter your email address to continue reading

We frequently post interesting articles and comment from our world class content providers so please provide us with your email address and we will notify you when new articles are available.

We'll also get in touch with various news and updates that we think will interest you. We promise to not spam, sell, or otherwise abuse your address (you can unsubscribe at any time).

See all Breakdown videos

Comments

comments powered by Disqus

Nick has worked as a rugby analyst and advisor to Graham Henry (1999-2002), Mike Ruddock (2004-2006) and latterly Stuart Lancaster (2011-2015). He also worked on the 2001 British & Irish Lions tour to Australia and produced his first rugby book with Graham Henry at the end of the tour. Since then, three more rugby books have followed, all of which of have either been nominated for, or won national sports book awards. The latest is a biography of Phil Larder, the first top Rugby League coach to successfully transfer over to Union. It is entitled “The Iron Curtain”. Nick has also written or contributed to four other books on literature and psychology. "He is currently writing articles for The Roar and The Rugby Site, and working as a strategy consultant to Stuart Lancaster and the Leinster coaching staff for their European matches."

Comments
Topic Breakdown
Applicable to Coaches   Players   Others   Supporters and fans  

Related articles

Why the new ‘escort’ rules will revive contestable kick-offs

Nick Bishop examines how the ‘no glove’ kicking defence has revived the interest in contestable kick-offs again.

Why more access to the high ball makes for a better game of rugby

Removing the ‘glove defence’ results in a much cleaner and quicker development of the play, as evidenced by Nick Bishop in this week’s analysis.

How to shuffle the deck close to the goal-line

Analyst Nick Bishop illustrates how the ‘use it or lose it’ mindset now applied (under the new law), to “The ball is played or taken into in-goal by an attacking player and is then held up”, is promoting more attacking innovation.

How to exploit the ELV on defensive scrum-halves [from scrum] – part 2

Nick follows on from his earlier article on how the scrum has now became a favourite weapon of attack and the short-side was the red-hot area target zone.

Why the ‘Dupont’s Law’ change really makes a difference

The ‘Dupont’ law tweaks have already had a concrete impact on the value of the kick return, one which totally belies the relatively small scope of the word ‘tweak’ as Nick Bishop illustrates.