Articles

Why the ‘caterpillar countdown’ can change the face of rugby Posted 5 months ago

Coaches are always on the lookout for subtle law-changes which can have important consequences out on the field. One of the most significant recent adjustments is the quickening of play from the so-called ‘caterpillar ruck’, in which the kicking scrum-half will retreat to the back of a multi-layered breakdown before launching a high contestable kick.

The new officiating guidance reads thus:
15.17 When the ball has been clearly won by a team at the ruck, and is available to be played, the referee calls “use it”, after which the ball must be played away within five seconds. Sanction: scrum.

It is still rare for this guidance to be applied stringently, but New Zealander James Doleman was consistently sharp in his application throughout the game between Australia and Georgia.

He set the tone for proceedings in the 4th minute of the game:

Doleman gestures with his left arm for the ‘use it!’ command, then gestures again for a two-second warning. When the Georgian scrum-half does not comply, he awards a turnover scrum to the Wallabies.

The second important effect is that the five-second warning shortens the caterpillar, forcing would-be blockers to stand out of the ruck. The ball is more amenable to be blocked-down, and the kick has to be launched without an added layer of protection:

Thirdly, the quicker tempo means that kicks are more likely to decease accuracy and allow greater space for the return team to exploit:

The kick from Wallaby scrum-half Tate McDermott is hurried, it is not contestable and there is ample space for the Georgian return team to advance well beyond halfway under no pressure at all.

Summary

All the signposts are that the five-second rule at the ruck will have a very positive impact on the game, and erode the status of the exit box-kick as a ‘third set-piece’. The threat of a turnover scrum will subtract offensive forwards from the ruck, increase the chance of a block-down while forcing more hurried clearances, thereby creating more space for an effective kick-return by the receiving team.

Enter your email address to continue reading

We frequently post interesting articles and comment from our world class content providers so please provide us with your email address and we will notify you when new articles are available.

We'll also get in touch with various news and updates that we think will interest you. We promise to not spam, sell, or otherwise abuse your address (you can unsubscribe at any time).

See all Defence videos

Comments

comments powered by Disqus

Nick has worked as a rugby analyst and advisor to Graham Henry (1999-2002), Mike Ruddock (2004-2006) and latterly Stuart Lancaster (2011-2015). He also worked on the 2001 British & Irish Lions tour to Australia and produced his first rugby book with Graham Henry at the end of the tour. Since then, three more rugby books have followed, all of which of have either been nominated for, or won national sports book awards. The latest is a biography of Phil Larder, the first top Rugby League coach to successfully transfer over to Union. It is entitled “The Iron Curtain”. Nick has also written or contributed to four other books on literature and psychology. "He is currently writing articles for The Roar and The Rugby Site, and working as a strategy consultant to Stuart Lancaster and the Leinster coaching staff for their European matches."

Comments
Topic Defence
Applicable to Coaches   Players   Others   Supporters and fans   Managers   Referees   Youths, ands, highs, and schools   Sevens  

Related articles

Why the new ‘escort’ rules will revive contestable kick-offs

Nick Bishop examines how the ‘no glove’ kicking defence has revived the interest in contestable kick-offs again.

Why more access to the high ball makes for a better game of rugby

Removing the ‘glove defence’ results in a much cleaner and quicker development of the play, as evidenced by Nick Bishop in this week’s analysis.

How to shuffle the deck close to the goal-line

Analyst Nick Bishop illustrates how the ‘use it or lose it’ mindset now applied (under the new law), to “The ball is played or taken into in-goal by an attacking player and is then held up”, is promoting more attacking innovation.

How to exploit the ELV on defensive scrum-halves [from scrum] – part 2

Nick follows on from his earlier article on how the scrum has now became a favourite weapon of attack and the short-side was the red-hot area target zone.

Why the ‘Dupont’s Law’ change really makes a difference

The ‘Dupont’ law tweaks have already had a concrete impact on the value of the kick return, one which totally belies the relatively small scope of the word ‘tweak’ as Nick Bishop illustrates.