Articles

Why the ‘Dupont’s Law’ change really makes a difference Posted 2 months ago

One of the biggest recent loopholes in the professional game as been the so-called ‘Dupont’s Law’, related to offside after a kick is made. Under the old law, all members of the kicking team ahead of the ball were automatically placed onside when the receiver either ran five metres, or passed or kicked the ball.

The practical outcome was that those defenders waited patiently upfield for the kick receiver to make his move before becoming very active indeed. Anyone who wishes to review the negative consequences of this law need look no further than the second half of the France-Scotland game from the 2024 Six Nations.

Thankfully World Rugby moved quickly to close the loophole, with significant adjustments to Laws 10.1, 10.4 and 10.7. The stipulations for the receiver to run five metres or pass the ball were dropped, and players from the kicking team were now required to move actively towards their own goal-posts from upfield positions after a kick.

These law tweaks have already had a concrete impact on the value of the kick return, one which totally belies the relatively small scope of the word ‘tweak’. One of the clearest examples occurred in the recent English Premiership match between Leicester Tigers and Bath Rugby:

Finn Russell – one of the main actors in the France-Scotland kicking farce – exits under pressure from his own goal-line. Under the old law, all those Bath forwards languishing near the 40m line would be placed onside once the receiver [Leicester’s Jack Van Portvliet] runs five metres. Under the new regulations, they must continue retiring towards their own goal-line and may not interfere in play:

Insert TRS Dupont 1

That gives the Tigers’ scrum-half free access to a position deep inside the Bath 22, and two phases later he administered the finishing touches to the move he started:

Summary

The Dutch painter Vincent Van Gogh once said, “Great things are done by a series of small things brought together". Substitute ‘laws’ for things, that saying could as easily be used to summarize the impact of kick returns, with no ‘Dupont’s Law’ to protect the chase.

Enter your email address to continue reading

We frequently post interesting articles and comment from our world class content providers so please provide us with your email address and we will notify you when new articles are available.

We'll also get in touch with various news and updates that we think will interest you. We promise to not spam, sell, or otherwise abuse your address (you can unsubscribe at any time).

See all Defence videos

Comments

comments powered by Disqus

Nick has worked as a rugby analyst and advisor to Graham Henry (1999-2002), Mike Ruddock (2004-2006) and latterly Stuart Lancaster (2011-2015). He also worked on the 2001 British & Irish Lions tour to Australia and produced his first rugby book with Graham Henry at the end of the tour. Since then, three more rugby books have followed, all of which of have either been nominated for, or won national sports book awards. The latest is a biography of Phil Larder, the first top Rugby League coach to successfully transfer over to Union. It is entitled “The Iron Curtain”. Nick has also written or contributed to four other books on literature and psychology. "He is currently writing articles for The Roar and The Rugby Site, and working as a strategy consultant to Stuart Lancaster and the Leinster coaching staff for their European matches."

Comments
Topic Defence
Applicable to Coaches   Players   Youths, ands, highs, and schools  

Related articles

Why the new ‘escort’ rules will revive contestable kick-offs

Nick Bishop examines how the ‘no glove’ kicking defence has revived the interest in contestable kick-offs again.

Why more access to the high ball makes for a better game of rugby

Removing the ‘glove defence’ results in a much cleaner and quicker development of the play, as evidenced by Nick Bishop in this week’s analysis.

How to shuffle the deck close to the goal-line

Analyst Nick Bishop illustrates how the ‘use it or lose it’ mindset now applied (under the new law), to “The ball is played or taken into in-goal by an attacking player and is then held up”, is promoting more attacking innovation.

How to exploit the ELV on defensive scrum-halves [from scrum] – part 2

Nick follows on from his earlier article on how the scrum has now became a favourite weapon of attack and the short-side was the red-hot area target zone.

How to build your lineout drive attack in the ‘red zone’

Get creative with your limitations, to turn them into a strength appears yo be Rassie Erasmus’ Springboks mantra as Nick Bishop illustrates.